Through this essay I aim to take an
advertising campaign from Star Models Bahia and analyse it from the
perspective of feminism. I will explore the ideas deliberately put
forward by the campaign as well as the ideas that may not have been
intended. I will then use what others have said about the campaign to
either confirm or deny my opinions and readings of the images.
Finally I will state wether I think the campaign is successful or
not, and how it might be improved or changed.
“You
are not a sketch, say no to anorexia”
campaign from Star
Models. The
advertising agency was Revolution.
The campaign consists of images
juxtaposing fashion designer style sketches with photoshopped models
made to look like the sketches. The images use off-white cream for
the background with the models in a pastel colour pallet. Awkward
hand drawn type holds the campaigns tag line: “You are not a
Sketch, Say no to anorexia” in one corner. The photographs of the
models have clearly been manipulated in such a way that they are the
same proportions as the sketches. Meaning the stylised skinniness of
the sketches is transferred; resulting in creepy, skeleton like
figures. Overall the images are compositionally sparse, using only
elements that are narratively essential (in this case the: Logo,
Sketch, Photo and tagline). This sparseness reduces the amount of
distractions within the image, allowing the intended meaning to take
centre stage.
The problem however, is the intended
meaning isn't holey clear. I can think of five different readings of
this campaign. Not all as sincere as I'm sure was intended.
- Models; you don't have to be skinny
- Normals; even models aren't this skinny
- Designers; draw and make more realistically sized clothes
- Anorexia is bad. Don't be anorexic
- It's designers fault models are skinny
If the
campaign is aimed at models, the imagery and message works to some
extent. If it's aimed at normal
women however, the message stumbles. As raised by Mirna (Editor of
Elle Croatia) on her blog, “they could just as easily juxtapose a
picture of a runway model next to one of the average female and
change “YOU ARE NOT A SKETCH” to “YOU ARE NOT A MODEL.” but
that wouldn't shift the blame away from the modelling agency, so
wouldn't make publicity sense.
This all makes the campaign feel very
worthy, in the way that it is instructing girls not to compare
themselves with the sketches without doing anything to help. In the
end it's still a fashion advert with skinny models. It's like the
purpose of the campaign was to highlight anorexia in fashion and how
designers make small clothes. Great, known issue now highlighted ...
now what? You got a few people to go "oh that's so sad, people
shouldn't be anorexic" and do nothing about it. The battle isn't
with awareness, people already know the problem. The battle is with
the overall attitude towards women in the media.
If we look at the credits to the campaign:
Advertising
Agency: Revolution, Brazil
Creative Directors: Emerson Braga, Edson Rosa
Art Director: Edson Rosa
Copywriter: Emerson Braga
Photographer: Diego Freire
Illustrators: Edson Rosa, Samuel Marinho
Additional credits: Carlos Pereira, Renata Matos, Vitor Barros, Flavio Fernandez, Melina Romariz, Mylene Alves, Clarissa Mattos, Jaime Neder Rezak
Creative Directors: Emerson Braga, Edson Rosa
Art Director: Edson Rosa
Copywriter: Emerson Braga
Photographer: Diego Freire
Illustrators: Edson Rosa, Samuel Marinho
Additional credits: Carlos Pereira, Renata Matos, Vitor Barros, Flavio Fernandez, Melina Romariz, Mylene Alves, Clarissa Mattos, Jaime Neder Rezak
Not that eating disorders and body issues are purely a female thing. Both men and women can be affected by anorexia, bulimia and feeling their bodies are inadequate. Though anorexia is less common in men (ANS, 2011) there are other disorders that are more prevalent (though less obvious) in relation to body inadequacy, such as obsessively trying to gain muscle mass and tone. These disorders can also be partly attributed to advertising and high fashion. Men in fashion are tall, handsome, muscular and well endowed. It feeds the same parts of the brain that say you are somehow inadequate or should change.
In short, I think that it is more common for women to consciously experience body issues at some point in their lives and be able to relate to that in other women by comparison with the general experience of men.
An article on Huffington Post compared the Star models campaign with an earlier anti-anorexia campaign from Nolita staring Isabelle Caro, a known anorexic model. This 2007 campaign showed Isabelle naked and reclined with “No Anorexia” written across it. Isabelle's figure at the time was incredibly slight, skeletal even and not dissimilar from the manipulated imagery from Star Models campaign. The campaign was very effective at the time and had a second wave of attention and meaning when Isabelle Caro died in 2010.
The Nolita campaign, though very effective in raising awareness and causing a stir, didn't change the attitude of the fashion industry all that much. The models stayed skinny, the clothes stayed small and the photoshopers made them all skinnier and bustier. The general attitude towards this tendency to the skeletal is gradually changing but whether that is down to; a specific campaign, the culmination of campaigns or the public becoming fed up with the saturation of media with unrealistic figures; is unknown. It could well be that the models are skinny because thats what the public want and that having so called plus sized models would be a detriment to the industry as a whole. I don't personally subscribe to this as I think many people would feel more comfortable looking at images of realistically beautiful models with flesh on their bones but I can see how the fashion industry would change itself to what sold more (in this case; skinny sells). Unfortunately the choice of skinny over plus has been removed from the majority of advertising, leaving only a few groundbreaking campaigns that use plus sized models.
Who is to blame for the state of the fashion industry and it's attitude to women? Is there anyone to blame? The campaign points to the fashion designers, they draw and make clothes for size zero or smaller girls after all. But they could just be fulfilling what art directors and magazine editors want for their runways and double page spreads. The art directors and editors must have complete control over every part of what they send into the world, unless the talents scouts only send them models fresh out of anorexia clinics (Slate 2013). Even then they could reject them and request less skeletal models without eating disorders. So it's back on the editors. Even the most aesthetically guided of which must also be influenced by what sells and makes them the most money or popularity. Over a long period of time, if the things that sell best are faced by slim models and the things that don't sell are faced by full figured models then the obvious marketing move is to have more slim models. So it's on the public, who buy the thing with the skinny model and the Photoshoped face. Regardless of what the public consciously think or say, they buy skinny. So editors want skinny to sell. So talent scouts find skinny and fashion designers make beautiful clothes to fit them. The designers can't make bespoke outfits for every individual model that will wear it, so the size is standardised; 5'8” tall with measurements of 34” chest 24” waist and 34” hips (AMA 2012), which equates to roughly size 4 US. Bare in mind, that is a short and large model by runway standards with some models being both taller and thiner.
People are impressionable and eager to fit in. Plastering images of unhealthy people and stating “this is what is beautiful, anything less than this is not attractive” is not good for us as a whole. Stop using women to sell your products and they might stop wanting to look like commodities. The want isn't a conscious want, it's a subconscious self comparison with your peers. If your peers are all tall, large breasted and stick thin then that is what you are going to compare yourself to at some level. Does this campaign change anything? Make anybody do anything differently? I don't think so but I think it's a step in the right direction at the very least. I don't think it's targeting the right people to be an effective campaign of change in the fashion industry.
Chris Steel - E&OE
Bibliography
StarModels (2013) Facebook page [Online] Available at: www.facebook.com/pages/Star-Models-Bahia/188748634477783?sk=wall&filter=12
Copyranter
(2013) Alarming Anorexia Ads Via Brazil
[Online] Available at:
www.Buzzfeed.com/copyranter/alarming-anorexia-ads-via-brazil?utm_source=feedly
Huffington post (2013) Anti-Anorexia
Ads Stun With Tagline 'You Are Not A Sketch'
[Online] Available at:
www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/18/anti-anorexia-ads-photos_n_3110649.html
9thDynasty (2013) Disturbing Anorexia fighting ads [Online] Available at: http://9thdynasty.tumblr.com/post/48615961867/disturbing-anorexia-fighting-ads-compare-skinny#disqus_thread
ANS – Anorexia Nervosa Statistics
(2011) “Anorexia affects approximately 1 in 150 fifteen-year-old
females, and 1 in 1000 fifteen-year-old males.” &
“Approximately 10 percent of cases of anorexia arise in men”
[Online] Available at:
www.disordered-eating.co.uk/eating-disorders-statistics/anorexia-nervosa-statistics-uk.html
Slate (2013) The Most Infuriating
Thing You Will Ever Read About the Modeling Industry - “Modelling
scouts have been gathering outside of Sweden’s largest
eating disorder clinic, trying to lure critically thin patients onto
the runway” [online] Available at:
www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/04/22/modeling_scouts_recruit_teen_patients_at_swedish_anorexia_clinic_are_you.html
AMA, Association
of Model Agents(2012) Getting started as a model
[online] available at:
www.associationofmodelagents.org/become-a-model/getting-started-as-a-model.html
No comments:
Post a Comment